The logic behind the agent

Production‑grade AI, engineered to ship.

We design and build LLM and multi-agent systems — and the cloud architecture that keeps them fast, observable, and cost-controlled once real users arrive.

Years building
7+
Projects delivered
30+
Delivery regions
US & IN

Built with

  • LangGraph
  • FastAPI
  • Kubernetes
  • Azure
  • AWS
  • Terraform
  • Pinecone
  • Postgres

Use cases

What we could build for your team

Pick a team and see the shape of the system. Same building blocks every time — a trigger, an agent with its model and tools, a decision, and somewhere the answer lands.

read write destroy approve reject Slack request “scale to 6” Intent agent Parse · plan · ground Policy gate RBAC + radius Read state kubectl · API Plan the diff terraform plan Hard stop Two humans Answer Read-only Approval Diff in Slack Apply terraform apply Discard Logged Chat modelreasoning Runbooksyour procedures Cluster APIlive state Incident memorywhat broke Self-correcting validator Re-plans on failure Schema Dry run

The hard part is not the agent — it is the guardrails around it. Permissions are checked before anything is planned, destructive actions cannot be approved by one person, every run emits traces and a diff, and the validator re-plans itself when a dry run fails.

Before

The demo worked. Then it met production.

Most AI work we get called into has already been built once. It stalls in the same three places every time.

A prototype nobody can ship

It answers beautifully in a notebook, then meets real traffic, real permissions and real edge cases. There is no route from that demo to something on-call can support.

No way to tell if it improved

Without an evaluation set, “better” is a matter of opinion. Every prompt change is a gamble, every regression is found by a customer, and nobody can say which version to trust.

Costs that scale the wrong way

Token spend and latency grow faster than usage does. The pilot was cheap enough to wave through; the rollout quietly becomes the largest line in the budget.

After

Built to survive contact with real users

We treat an AI feature like any other production system: scoped before it is built, measured while it is built, and handed over so your team owns it afterwards.

  • Fixed scope before codeAn architecture and a proposal, not an open-ended retainer
  • Evaluations from day oneQuality is a number you can watch, not a feeling
  • Handover, not lock-inDocs, dashboards and a walkthrough with your engineers

Capabilities

Three practices, one delivery team

Most engagements start in one and grow into the next — from a proof of concept, to a system in production, to the data work that keeps improving it.

AI Agents & GenAI Systems

LLM applications that hold up outside the demo — grounded in your data, measured, and guarded against the failure modes that surface in production.

  • Multi-agent workflows
  • RAG pipelines
  • Vector search
  • Evals & guardrails
  • Tool calling
  • Token & cost control
  • LLM observability
  • Knowledge search

Cloud-Native Product Engineering

The unglamorous half that decides whether an AI feature survives launch: services, pipelines, deployment, and infrastructure you can hand to a team.

  • FastAPI · Node · Django
  • Microservices & APIs
  • Docker · Kubernetes
  • CI/CD
  • AWS · Azure · GCP
  • Terraform
  • Web & app builds

Data Intelligence & Research

Evidence before opinion. Modelling, experimentation, and benchmarking that tell you which approach is actually worth building.

  • EDA & analytics
  • Predictive modelling
  • NLP pipelines
  • Data engineering
  • A/B testing
  • Model benchmarking

How we work

A short path from idea to production

No open-ended discovery. Each phase ends in something you can review, run, or hand to your team.

  1. 01

    Scope

    A working session on the problem, data, and constraints. You leave with an architecture and a fixed-scope proposal.

  2. 02

    Prototype

    A narrow end-to-end slice on your real data, with an evaluation set — so the decision to continue is based on numbers.

  3. 03

    Build

    Production hardening: infrastructure, CI/CD, guardrails, cost controls, and the tests that keep quality from drifting.

  4. 04

    Hand over

    Documentation, dashboards, and a walkthrough with your engineers. Ongoing support is optional, never a dependency.

Selected work

Systems running in production

Client names withheld under NDA. Happy to walk through the architecture and trade-offs on a call.

Enterprise · Support operations

Knowledge RAG over 200K+ documents

A retrieval layer across scattered internal documentation, surfaced where support agents already work rather than in yet another tool.

40% reduction in ticket resolution time
  • Hybrid retrieval with reranking
  • Slack bot + embedded web UI
  • AWS, autoscaled

Product · Research automation

Multi-agent research assistant

A LangGraph orchestration where planning, web search, and summarisation agents hand work between each other under an explicit state machine.

Typed state machine every hand-off between agents is explicit and replayable
  • Search & summarisation agents
  • Structured tool calling
  • Azure Kubernetes Service

Who we work with

Teams betting on AI, not experimenting with it

  • Startups shipping their first AI product
  • Enterprises modernising workflows with LLMs
  • Founders validating an AI MVP before raising
  • CTOs who need an architecture they can defend

Get in touch

Book a consult

Tell us what you're building and where it's stuck. We reply within one business day.